Ongoing Monitoring · SAR Filing · PPSI Compliance
The GENIUS Act (S.394, signed July 2025) creates the first stablecoin-specific transaction monitoring regime. §104(d) mandates ongoing monitoring. §104(e) mandates SAR filing. Together they define the complete KYT compliance surface that PPSIs must implement. Full compliance required by July 2026.
Regulatory Context
The GENIUS Act regime: The GENIUS Act (S.394, signed July 2025) creates the first stablecoin-specific transaction monitoring regime. §104(d) mandates ongoing monitoring. §104(e) mandates SAR filing. Together they define the KYT compliance surface.
Ongoing Monitoring Mandate
Every customer transfer must be screened in real-time against sanctions lists, risk databases, and behavioral heuristics.
When a transaction triggers a risk threshold, the PPSI must update the customer's risk profile and may require re-verification of customer identity.
PPSIs must identify and flag suspicious behavioral patterns that indicate potential money laundering, including structuring, layering, round-tripping, and smurfing.
Transfers across bridge protocols and chain hops must be tracked and monitored as a single transaction flow, not as separate on-chain events.
Suspicious Activity Reporting
A transaction must be filed as a SAR when it meets two criteria: amount >$5,000 AND presence of one or more suspicious indicators.
PPSIs must file SARs with FinCEN via the BSA E-Filing system within the required timeframe after transaction settlement.
PPSIs must retain SAR records and supporting documentation for 5 years from the date of filing.
For transactions involving known terrorist organizations, sanctions designees, or active law enforcement targets, PPSIs must notify relevant law enforcement agencies.
Technical Implementation
Each §104 requirement has specific infrastructure dependencies. This table maps requirement → layer → vendors → current coverage.
| Requirement | Infrastructure | Vendors | Layer | Type | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| §104(d)(1) | Real-time transaction screening | Chainalysis KYT API, Elliptic Lens, TRM Risk API | L4 | Monitor | Full |
| §104(d)(2) | Risk-trigger KYC re-verification | KYT→KYC callback system, StableKYC integration | L5 | Integration | Partial |
| §104(d)(3) | Behavioral pattern detection | Chainalysis Reactor, heuristic engines, vendor APIs | L4 | Monitor | Full |
| §104(d)(4) | Cross-chain tracking | Elliptic Navigator, TRM cross-chain module | L4 | Monitor | Partial |
| §104(e)(1) | SAR identification ($5K + suspicious) | Threshold monitor + indicator flagging | L4 | Monitor | Full |
| §104(e)(2) | FinCEN SAR e-filing | FinCEN BSA e-filing system integration | L5 | Obligation | Full |
| §104(e)(3) | 5-year SAR record retention | Compliance data archive system | L5 | Obligation | Partial |
| §104(e)(4) | Law enforcement notification | Automated escalation workflow | L5 | Obligation | Partial |
Compliance Calendar
Related Content
CIP requirements for Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers. The KYC foundation that enables KYT monitoring.
Detailed pattern typologies that §104(d)(3) requires PPSIs to detect. Structuring, layering, round-tripping, and more.
Live POC demos, KYT stack architecture, and the complete monitoring landscape overview.
The OCC PPSI regime and how §104 KYT/SAR obligations fit into the broader stablecoin charter.
Interactive tool to map vendor capabilities to §104(d) and §104(e) requirements. See which solutions cover which obligations.